Rakusen (Respondent) v Jepsen and others (Appellants) Case ID: 2024/0188 Case summary Issue Can a Rent Repayment Order only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable? Facts The Respondent, Mr Rakusen, is the leaseholder of a flat on Finchley Road in North … Ver más Web31 de dic. de 2003 · Stephen Rakusin (“Rakusin”) appeals the final order awarding Christiansen and Jacknin, P.A., attorney's fees and costs based upon the court's …

Rakusen (Respondent) v Jepson and others (Appellants) - The Suprem…

WebThe Respondent, Mr Rakusen, is the leaseholder of a flat on Finchley Road in North London. In May 2016 he granted a tenancy of the flat to Kensington Propert... WebOn 26 January 2024, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Jepsen & Ors v Rakusen UKSC 2024/188.. In the Housing Act 2004, Parliament created the rent repayment order (“RRO”). This was an additional remedy for tenants (to recover rent) and local authorities (to recover housing benefit) available in particular circumstances against landlords who had … d day ww2 short definition

Rakusen v Jepsen - Private Rented Sector Professionals

Web3 de ago. de 2024 · Rakusen v Jepsen Mr Rakusen was the leaseholder for a flat. On 31 May 2016 Mr Rakusen let the property to Kensington Property Investment Group Ltd on the basis they would rent the property, which created a rent to rent agreement. There was no house of multiple occupancy (HMO) licence for the property. WebThe respondent on this appeal is Martin Rakusen, who can be referred to as a superior landlord of property licensed out to the appellants, Mikkel Jepsen, Ronan Murphy and … WebRent Repayment Orders and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal in the case of Rakusen v Jepsen. The case concerns the Rent … gelatin sensory play